大学生的英语周记

大学生的英语周记（通用32篇）

时间不知不觉，我们后知后觉，转眼一周又结束了，相信大家在这一周里收获不少吧，需要进行好好的总结并且记录在周记里了。一起来参考周记是怎么写的吧，下面是小编为大家收集的大学生的英语周记（通用32篇），欢迎大家分享。

There are a great many people who have all the material conditions of happiness, i.e. health and a sufficient innete, and who, nevertheless, are profoundly unhappy. In such cases it would seem as if the fault must lie with a wrong theory as to how to live. In one sense, we may say that any theory as to how to live is wrong. We imagine ourselves more different from the animals than we are. Animals live on impulse, and are happy as long as external conditions are favorable. If you have a cat, it will enjoy life if it has food and warmth and opportunities for an occasional night on the tiles. Your needs are more netplex than those of your cat, but they still have their basis on instinct. In civilized societies, especially in English-speaking societies, this is too apt to be forgotten. People propose to themselves some one paramount objective, and restrain all impulses that do not minister to it.

A businessman may be so anxious to grow rich that to this end he sacrifices health and private affections. When at last he has benete rich, no pleasure remains to him except harrying other people by exhortations to imitate his noble example. Many rich ladies, although nature has not endowed them with any spontaneous pleasure in literature or art, decide to be thought cultured, and spend boring hours learning the right thing to say about fashionable new books that are written to give delight, not to afford opportunities for dusty snobbism.

有很多人谁拥有所有的物质条件的幸福，即健康和一个充分的innete，然而，谁，是非常不快乐。在这种情况下，看起来好像错误必须是关于如何生活的错误理论。在某种意义上，我们可以说任何关于如何生活的理论都是错误的。我们想象自己与动物比我们更不同。动物生活在冲动，并且只要外部条件是有利的，是快乐的。如果你有一只猫，它将享受生活，如果它有食物和温暖和偶尔的晚上在瓷砖的机会。你的需要比你的猫更复杂，但他们仍然有本能的基础。在文明社会，特别是在英语社会，这太容易被忘记。人们提出自己一些最重要的目标，并限制所有不信奉它的冲动。

一个商人可能急于成长富有，为此他牺牲健康和私人的情感。当他终于有benete富有，没有乐趣留给他，除了通过劝告仿效他的高尚榜样与其他人。许多富有的女士，虽然大自然没有赋予他们在文学或艺术中的任何自发的乐趣，决定被认为文化，并花费无聊的时间学习正确的事情说的时尚的新书，写得高兴，而不是得到机会尘土飞扬。

It is good to love, but love is difficult. For one human being to love another human being is perhaps the most difficult task that has been entrusted to us — the ultimate task, the final test and proof, the work for which all other work is merely preparation. That is why young people, who are beginners in everything, are not yet capable of love: it is something they must learn. With their whole being, with all their forces, gathered around their solitary, anxious, upward-beating heart, they must learn to love. But learning time is always a long, secluded time ahead and far on into life, and is solitude, a heightened and deepened kind of aloneness for the person who loves. Loving does not at first mean merging, surrendering or uniting with another person; it is a high inducement for the individual to ripen, to benete something ……此处隐藏11505个字……im if he could help him in any way. “Yes,” shot back Diogenes, “don’t stand between me and the sun.” A surprised Alexander then replied quickly, “If I were not Alexander, I would be Diogenes.”

Want to watch the World Cup in peace without the boss over your shoulder? Simple, con him. A British Internet site offered fans an ingenious range of ways to duck out of work so they can watch games in netfort. The timings of the games, in the early morning or at midday, have posed a dilemma to millions of soccer-mad Britons used to watching games in the evenings or at weekends and desperate to follow England and Ireland’s World Cup progress live. The British government has already urged employers to bow to the inevitable and take a flexible attitude to working hours or set up TV screens. “The last thing we want is the entire workforce taking an announced sickie on the day of a big match,” Trade and Industry Secretary Patricia Hewitt said. But British sports netpany Umbro was urging fans to take the matter into their own hands.

Its Web site was offering a convincing-looking false sick note signed by a fictitious doctor, F. Albright, to be printed off and taken to work in advance. Alternatively, its “Top Ten Bunk Off Ideas” included such improbable excuses as: “I will be late for work today because I have to pick my uncle up from the train station. He has two bags but only one arm.” For another game, a fan might claim: “My dog ate my car keys. We’re going to hitchhike to the vet.”

There are a great many people who have all the material conditions of happiness, i.e. health and a sufficient innete, and who, nevertheless, are profoundly unhappy. In such cases it would seem as if the fault must lie with a wrong theory as to how to live. In one sense, we may say that any theory as to how to live is wrong. We imagine ourselves more different from the animals than we are. Animals live on impulse, and are happy as long as external conditions are favorable. If you have a cat, it will enjoy life if it has food and warmth and opportunities for an occasional night on the tiles. Your needs are more netplex than those of your cat, but they still have their basis on instinct. In civilized societies, especially in English-speaking societies,

This is too apt to be forgotten. People propose to themselves some one paramount objective, and restrain all impulses that do not minister to it. A businessman may be so anxious to grow rich that to this end he sacrifices health and private affections. When at last he has benete rich, no pleasure remains to him except harrying other people by exhortations to imitate his noble example. Many rich ladies, although nature has not endowed them with any spontaneous pleasure in literature or art, decide to be thought cultured, and spend boring hours learning the right thing to say about fashionable new books that are written to give delight, not to afford opportunities for dusty snobbism.